Readers write: Letters to the editor, October 4, 2017

Menace to state’s future big

Re: Charles Wohlforth, “State’s financial system hasn’t hit backside …” (Sept. 26).
I agree with Charles in his evaluation, however I feel an extended-time period perspective is extra grim for Alaskans and we have to begin some intense dialogue and motion to melt the blow. Clearly the present price range issues are brought on by lack of oil taxes and royalties, as a consequence of decrease costs brought on by an excessive amount of provide and never sufficient demand. I feel each these elements are brought on by engineering advances, fracking and horizontal drilling on the availability aspect and elevated gasoline effectivity of inner combustion engines on the demand aspect.

Past that, China and Europe are each placing main legislative agendas in place to mandate electrical automobiles; that in all probability represents 60 % or extra of worldwide auto gross sales. The U.S. Congress shouldn’t be shifting aggressively on the topic however notice that Wall Road is brutally punishing any U.S. auto firm that isn’t shifting aggressively to supply electrical automobiles. Using oil as a gasoline is unlikely to thoroughly cease, however I feel it’s clear that volumes will shrink dramatically. This can trigger additional worth decreases in oil in the long term, and solely the very lowest value producers on the earth will have the ability to keep within the enterprise. It’s inconceivable that Alaska will have the ability to compete in that surroundings. So if oil will not pay the payments in Alaska, notably for presidency — then what???

Do the maths and we’d like an business that may afford to pay at the very least $5 billion in annual taxes; for comparability, I feel $5 billion is about one hundred pc of the seafood business revenues within the state, so no cash for wages, gasoline, boats, and so on. For my part, the menace to the state’s future is large.

Kneeling is taking a stand

Colin Kaepernick’s conduct, from what I find out about him, suggests a professional-life ethic, love of freedom, patriotism and opposition to authorities overreach. He staged his protest due to the 1,000 or so People, many unarmed, killed annually by police forces. Like me, he does not purchase a number of the excuses cops have used to kill harmless individuals. Murder shouldn’t be professional-life.

Now, I labored in a police division and I do know most cops are respectable trustworthy guys. However, if some 250-pound bodybuilder shoots your grandma to dying as a result of he was afraid she’d strangle him, will the phrase “a number of dangerous apples” console you?
Kaepernick exercised his proper to precise his opinions and the liberty to comply with his conscience as an alternative of…

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *