We knew this was coming. Senate Majority Chief Wealthy Wardner advised me again in June that lawmakers wanted only one extra vote to maneuver ahead with a authorized motion, including that Burgum had engaged in “selective deletion.”
However Burgum, in a press launch, stated the lawsuit isn’t “a prudent use of taxpayer dollars.”
“As I’ve said earlier than, the intent of those vetoes was to guard government department authority, protect the separation of powers and stop spending of scarce state assets with out full legislative assessment,” Burgum stated. “Whereas we don’t consider this lawsuit to be a prudent use of taxpayer dollars, we’ll reply accordingly to any authorized motion that makes an attempt to infringe on government department authority. Within the meantime, we stay squarely targeted on reinventing authorities and being as environment friendly as potential with taxpayer dollars as we stock out the duties of the chief department.”
Click on right here to proceed studying the publish.