N.D. university system chancellor survives challenge to his contract in wake of …

In a deadlocked four-four vote on Thursday, Sept. 28, the board rejected a movement to carry a particular assembly to debate Hagerott’s contract in mild of attainable litigation.

Hagerott, whose administration type got here beneath criticism in a assessment final yr, has requested for an investigation, claiming the criticism was fallout from a political controversy.

Some Republican lawmakers criticized Hagerott for not disciplining Ed Schafer, who final yr served as interim president of the College of North Dakota, for endorsing Gov. Doug Burgum within the Republican main race for governor in 2016. Additionally, Hagerott lately fired a vice chancellor, and a few have argued the transfer was made so he might improve the wage of a former Navy colleague of Hagerott’s who had lately joined the chancellor’s employees.

The movement for a particular assembly to evaluation Hagerott’s contract got here from member Mike Ness. “I might wish to name for a particular assembly sooner or later,” to debate Hagerott’s contract and the potential for litigation in mild of current occasions.

Chairman Don Morton opposed the movement. “I might be towards doing this,” Morton stated, noting that the board had determined in June to increase Hagerott’s contract. “There is no want to return and revisit it.”

Ness’s movement, which wanted a majority to move, failed on a vote of four-four. Ness, Nick Hacker, Casey Ryan and scholar member Jacob Dailey voted in favor of the movement. Morton, Vice Chairman Greg Stemen, Kathleen Neset and Kevin Melicher opposed it.

Prior to now, when the board has revisited the contract of a chancellor or campus president, the outcome has typically been a contract buyout to clean the best way for a departure.

Earlier than the vote, Stemen learn a press release, promising to debate the controversies within the chancellor’s workplace sooner or later, “in a well timed and extra importantly properly-ready method.”

Stemen stated the board is obligated to deal with the problems, however stated the board’s first obligation is to the North Dakota College System’s forty six,000 college students.

“The board shouldn’t be pushed by the media cycle,” Stemen stated.

Later within the assembly, when Hagerott was presenting his up to date objectives, the board mentioned revising evaluation procedures for the chancellor.

Melicher stated board members’ names must be hooked up to written feedback concerning the chancellor, to exclude “rumor and innuendo.”

Ness complained that board members didn’t see Hagerott’s ultimate analysis, but in addition stated he was involved that some evaluations meant to be personal might flip up in an open data request. He…

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *