In impact, that is voter suppression by revenue. Regardless of assertions on the contrary, absentee voting doesn’t alleviate this drawback. It has its personal problems.
Based on the Herald article revealed Sept. 6, the Metropolis Council mentioned three difficulties with polling by precinct.
One was the price concerned. I checked with the finance workplace at Metropolis Corridor and was knowledgeable that the estimated value of full precinct voting was $15,000 to $20,000. That is about .007 % of the 2017 finances of $281 million. Comparatively, the fee just isn’t vital.
Additionally cited was the reducing availability of polling websites. In line with metropolis data, in 2016 12 polling websites have been recognized for 19 residents. That is down one from 2014, when thirteen polling websites have been designated. In 2016 two extra precincts would wish to share a polling place. This isn’t the perfect, however neither is it damaged.
Metropolis Council additionally mentioned the problem that exists in acquiring sufficient ballot staff. I’ve witnessed this twice as an election inspector. It’s true the auditor’s workplace has needed to work very arduous, however additionally it is true they’ve gotten the job achieved.
Difficulties relating to polling websites and volunteers will not be going away. Ideally there must be 19 polling websites, one situated in every precinct. And it might be higher for everybody if the auditor’s workplace didn’t need to scramble for ballot staff.
It’s time for some artistic considering. Can there be incentives for opening polling websites? Can there be an outreach program to safe extra volunteers?
Any fixes to precinct voting have to be measured towards the result of creating voting equally obtainable to all certified residents. By designating just one polling place, the Metropolis Council has fallen far in need of this mark.