Higher ed leaders mostly quiet on chancellor

SBHE Chair Don Morton stated Monday that board members weren’t planning to boost the difficulty in any respect. However after an agenda addition introduced Wednesday, the board not directly touched on the accusations earlier than shifting right into a closed government session to debate the authorized implications of claims made by Lisa Feldner, a system vice chancellor fired by Hagerott earlier this fall. Feldner, who additionally served as Hagerott’s chief of employees, alleged Nov. 17 to the state Division of Labor and Human Rights that the chancellor had fostered a hostile work surroundings by means of discriminatory practices and unprofessional behaviors. When Morton and former board Chair Kathleen Neset have been made conscious of points within the system workplace, Feldner claimed, they responded inadequately and allowed discrimination to proceed.

Morton and Hagerott have beforehand said they “strongly disagree” with Feldner’s characterization of occasions, that are captured in a 17-web page narrative. Hagerott went additional Thursday to say he categorically denied the claims of his earlier second-in-command.

“I hope individuals could be affected person” for the outcomes of a proper investigation, he stated.

What little the board did say publicly about Feldner was in dialogue of a current college system workplace local weather report revealed earlier this month that confirmed a principally constructive temper amongst NDUS workplace employees. Feldner was not truly recognized by identify within the dialogue and was referred to all through the assembly as an unnamed vice chancellor.

Earlier than the chief session started, board members Nick Hacker and Mike Ness briefly questioned how comparable the brand new research was to its unofficial predecessor, a set of interviews compiled by NDUS compliance officer Carol Riedman in 2016 in response to an occasion through which the chancellor allegedly overreacted to an open data request. That earlier research yielded a largely unflattering view of Hagerott’s management.

Earlier than Riedman outlined the methods through which the newest research differed in technique from the previous one, Morton described the context of how that first assessment happened.

In response to Morton, the primary local weather research was prompted by Feldner, who approached board management as a result of she believed there have been “some issues happening within the workplace that that individual thought was making a hostile work setting.”

Morton stated Feldner advisable that he and Neset converse with two particular staff. Upon doing so, Morton continued, he got here to the conclusion that Feldner “sort of exaggerated and it wasn’t an…

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *