A transcript of arguments from Grand Forks District Courtroom is not due till November, and Supreme Courtroom officers are unaware of any requests to expedite its preparation. And although the transcript might be delivered earlier, as soon as it’s, there is a briefing window for attorneys to submit written statements on the case that stretches even longer. After which, stated Penny Miller, Supreme Courtroom clerk, it is one other two to 4 weeks till the case would doubtless be heard.
Meaning means it should probably be months—and probably into subsequent yr—earlier than arguments are made earlier than the courtroom in any respect.
In consequence, development might be nicely underway by the point a choice is reached on the case. Kevin Ritterman, president of Dakota Business and Improvement, stated the lot can be “leveled and stripped” in coming weeks, and stated he is nonetheless unconcerned concerning the attraction.
“We personal the property,” Ritterman beforehand informed the Herald. “They will definitely do what they need to do. However no, we’re full steam forward. We’re wanting ahead, not backward.”
The attraction earlier than the Supreme Courtroom goes again to the June 20 election that determined Arbor Park’s future. Voters rejected a poll measure to protect the park with the Grand Forks Park District, permitting metropolis leaders to maneuver forward with plans to promote the land to a developer to construct a 5-story, combined-use constructing with condos and business area.
Earlier this summer time, a gaggle of about 20 Grand Forks voters sought to have the election voided in a go well with filed by Henry Howe, an area lawyer. Howe argued that the town exceeded its authority by holding all its voting on the Alerus Middle and that 4 absentee ballots have been incorrectly invalidated. The case was dismissed in Grand Forks District Courtroom, resulting in the attraction.
Howe and Ron Fischer, the lawyer representing the town of Grand Forks, couldn’t be reached for remark.