After several 2017 Iditarod sled dogs test positive for a ‘prohibited substance,…


After “a number of” sled canine competing within the 2017 Iditarod examined constructive for “a prohibited substance,” the Iditarod Path Committee Board of Administrators voted Friday to vary its guidelines.

The canine that examined constructive have been in a “single musher’s workforce,” the Iditarod stated in a press release launched Monday. The assertion didn’t identify the musher or say what drug the canine examined constructive for.

Chas St. George, Iditarod spokesman, declined to offer that info in an interview Monday. He additionally wouldn’t say the place on the path the canine have been examined and what number of canine on the group examined constructive.

St. George stated “authorized considerations” and “confidentiality” prevented him from releasing the knowledge.

Race officers haven’t penalized the unnamed musher, St. George stated.

The 2017 race guidelines prevented them from disqualifying the competitor as a result of they might not show the musher’s intent, he stated.

Underneath the 2017 guidelines, race officers needed to show that a musher meant to offer his or her canine with a prohibited drug and that the drug didn’t discover one other approach into the canine’s system, whether or not unknowingly laced in meat the canine ate or whether or not given to it by a competitor.

Underneath the revised rule, mushers might be “strictly liable” for any constructive drug exams, the assertion stated.

If there’s a constructive drug check, the musher should now show she or he had nothing to do with it, as an alternative of race officers shouldering the burden of proof.

“Now intent is a bit of bit totally different when it comes to the place the onus lies,” St. George stated. “Now it lies instantly upon the musher.”

The revised rule says that if a sled canine on a musher’s workforce exams constructive, that musher should go earlier than a assessment panel and show “by clear and convincing proof that the constructive exams resulted from causes utterly past their management.”

That proof might embrace the musher taking a polygraph check, the rule says. If the Iditarod requires a polygraph check, it is going to pay for the testing prices.

The revised rule additionally says that any musher discovered liable for tampering with one other musher’s canine, meals, snacks or provides in a method that impacts that staff’s drug exams might be disqualified “and/or” banned from the race.

The Iditarod Path Committee Board of Administrators unanimously handed the revised drug testing rule at its assembly Friday.

St. George stated the Iditarod was treating the constructive drug checks within the 2017 race “very, very, very significantly.”

He stated he didn’t…



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *